I am Not Just a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back
Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip streaming internet sites, where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here most of the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this is one worker whom keeps their very own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a really quiet man. He just strolled in really calmly having an axe and smashed all the machines. There were a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But prison overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The next of those two stories is really a bit more terrifying, once the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a person in the staff at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse casinopokies777.com if he don’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the criminal activity stated that two men, both putting on ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate aided by the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ plus the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the regional public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every and each of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is related to the idea that neighboring communities will be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, is one of the handful of applicants who have recommended that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes to your proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote onto it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed benefits.’
According to the state laws that produced the opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate payment, with arbitration required if the gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t come to a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed having a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power over the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley have not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston world survey found that six for the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in support of it, with only two coming out against it (with Conley and an added candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten candidates supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by their state due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the recreations book cookie container after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading sports betting company CEO.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering store critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one associated with largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the many wagering outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there clearly was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with betting shops and pay day loan companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a written report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.
Spared for a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner associated with Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna claimed that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect using the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be searching to ruin the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this year his workplace had been accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.